Skip to content

Human Questions

What Is the Narrative Self? Identity as Story

The narrative self is the view that personal identity is constituted by the stories we tell about ourselves. Dennett's "center of narrative gravity," MacIntyre's quest, Ricoeur's narrative identity, and Schechtman's theory are its major forms.

Quick Answer

The narrative self is the theory that we constitute our identity by telling stories about ourselves — integrating experiences into a coherent autobiography. Daniel Dennett compares the self to a center of narrative gravity, and Marya Schechtman argues that being a person requires self-narrative; the view explains both identity and meaning in life.

narrative-selfselfpersonal-identityidentitydennettstorytelling

Key Takeaways

  • The self is constituted by the stories we tell about our lives.
  • Dennett calls the self a 'center of narrative gravity.'
  • Schechtman argues self-narrative is required for personhood.
  • The theory connects personal identity with meaning, agency, and ethics.

What Is the Narrative Self?

Direct Answer

The narrative self is the view that a person's identity is constituted by the stories she tells about her life. On this view, you are not first a thing and then someone who happens to narrate; the narration is partly what makes you you. A self is the protagonist of its own autobiography: by selecting events, interpreting them, connecting them into a plot, and taking responsibility for the character that emerges, a person becomes a unified agent with a past, a present, and a future. The view is defended in different forms by philosophers as diverse as Daniel Dennett, Alasdair MacIntyre, Paul Ricoeur, and Marya Schechtman.

The key distinction is between a strong and a weak reading of the thesis. The weak reading says we have self-narratives that shape our psychology: the stories we tell influence how we remember, decide, and relate to others. The strong reading — the philosophical one — says self-narrative is constitutive of identity: without the story, there is no persisting self to be identical over time. Marya Schechtman's "narrative self-constitution view" is the strongest modern defense: a person is constituted by her self-narrative, and her experiences and actions are hers insofar as they can be incorporated into that narrative.

Dennett's version is the most striking. He compares the self to a "center of narrative gravity" — not a thing in the brain but an abstraction, like the center of gravity of a physical object, which is real enough but exists only as a way of organizing the object's behavior. The self is the focal point of the torrent of self-description the brain produces: the "I" is the character the brain is constantly writing and revising. The story is not a report on an independently existing self; the story is what makes the self.

Historical Context

The narrative turn in philosophy grew out of the reaction against two earlier pictures. The Cartesian picture of the self as a thinking substance and the Humean picture of the self as a bundle of perceptions both treated the self as something found in introspection. Narrative theorists argued that both pictures miss the essentially temporal, interpretive, and social character of human life. The roots lie in Herder and the Romantic tradition, in Hegel's account of self-consciousness as recognition through others, and in existentialist claims that existence precedes essence — that we are not given selves but must become them.

The contemporary theory crystallized in the 1980s. Alasdair MacIntyre's After Virtue (1981) argued that human life has the structure of a narrative quest, and that moral identity requires being able to give an account of one's life as a story. Paul Ricoeur developed a full "narrative identity" theory in Time and Narrative and Oneself as Another, arguing that the self is constituted by the interplay between the story and the living of it. Daniel Dennett's 1992 paper gave the view its most radical, naturalistic form, and Marya Schechtman's The Constitution of Selves (1996) made it precise enough to engage the analytic debate about personal identity.

Key Arguments & Debates

The argument for the narrative self is that it explains what both substance and bundle theories miss: the meaning of a life. A person is not just a sequence of experiences; she is a being who understands her experiences, interprets them, and organizes them around projects and values. This interpretive unity — the fact that my life is mine in the way a story is mine — is what narrative theory explains. The view also handles the ethics of identity: responsibility presupposes that an agent can own her past as her own story, and the narrative self gives an account of such ownership. Schechtman argues that the "characterization" and "survival" questions of personal identity are both answered by the self-narrative: I am the person whose story this is.

The objections are serious. First, the fabrication objection: if the self is a story, and stories can be false, then the self can be a fiction — which seems to make identity unreal. Defenders reply that the narrative can be more or less faithful to the actual history, and that a good narrative must be constrained by reality. Second, the arbitrariness objection: narratives select and interpret, so there is no single correct story of a life — identity becomes a matter of choice. Third, the exclusion objection: some people — those with severe amnesia, dementia, or minimal self-narrative capacity — would be excluded from personhood, which seems wrong. Fourth, the fragmentation objection, pressed by Galen Strawson: some people simply do not experience their lives as narratives, yet they are clearly persons. The debate over whether narrative is necessary, sufficient, or merely typical for identity remains unresolved.

Contemporary Relevance

The narrative self has become a bridge between philosophy, psychology, and clinical practice. Narrative therapy treats psychological problems as problems of maladaptive life stories and helps clients re-author them; research on "autobiographical reasoning" shows that the ability to construct coherent life narratives predicts psychological well-being. In ethics and law, the narrative view underwrites the importance of "giving an account of oneself," of victim testimony, and of restorative justice. In the age of social media and AI, the theory has gained new urgency: our identities are increasingly constructed through curated digital narratives, and the question of who authors the story — the person, the platform's algorithms, or an AI — is becoming a practical ethical problem. If identity is narrative, then the battle for control of our self-narratives is a battle for ourselves.

Further Learning

  • Daniel C. Dennett, "The Self as a Center of Narrative Gravity" (1992).
  • Marya Schechtman, The Constitution of Selves (1996).
  • Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Personal Identity

Learning Path

Part of a Structured Collection

Knowledge Network

Archive references

Sources

3 scholarly sources
  • 01
    The Self as a Center of Narrative GravityBy Daniel C. DennettIn Self and Consciousness: Multiple Perspectives, 1992.
  • 02
    The Constitution of SelvesBy Marya SchechtmanIthaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.
  • 03
    Personal IdentityBy Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyConsult source

ZHAIBIAN Editorial Board reviewed

Reviewed by ZHAIBIAN AI Editorial Review · 2026-08-11

Based on 3 scholarly sourcesLast updated 2026-08-11