Skip to content

Quotation Archive

Bentham Quote on Natural Rights: Nonsense upon Stilts

Bentham's dismissal of natural rights as "nonsense upon stilts" from Anarchical Fallacies: rights are creatures of law, not nature, and the Declaration of the Rights of Man rests on a confusion.

Quotation archive

Natural rights is simple nonsense: natural and imprescriptible rights, rhetorical nonsense, nonsense upon stilts.

Jeremy Bentham · Anarchical Fallacies

Quote record

Author

Jeremy Bentham

Source

Anarchical Fallacies

Chapter / location

1796

Tradition

jeremy-bentham · natural-rights · utilitarianism · rights-critique · political-philosophy · declarations

Source information

From Anarchical Fallacies, 1796.

Original language: English

Translation

Translated from English into English using a named scholarly edition.

Context

Anarchical Fallacies (1796) is Jeremy Bentham's ferocious critique of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, adopted by the French National Assembly in 1789. Bentham, the founder of utilitarianism, attacked the doctrine of natural rights on two fronts: metaphysical and political. Metaphysically, the claim that there are rights "before" and "independently of" government is nonsense, because a right is the creature of law — there is no right where there is no legal institution to create and enforce it. Politically, the declaration of absolute natural rights is anarchical: it arms every individual with a claim against every law, and it makes government, which alone can secure happiness, impossible. The phrase "nonsense upon stilts" — the rhetorical inflation of a conceptual confusion — became the most famous dismissal of the theory of natural rights in the history of philosophy.

Interpretation

Bentham's dismissal of natural rights as "nonsense upon stilts" from Anarchical Fallacies: rights are creatures of law, not nature, and the Declaration of the Rights of Man rests on a confusion.

Knowledge network

Related Archive Records

Quote

"Natural rights is simple nonsense: natural and imprescriptible rights, rhetorical nonsense, nonsense upon stilts." — Jeremy Bentham, Anarchical Fallacies (1796)

Author

Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832) was an English philosopher and legal reformer, the founder of utilitarianism: the moral and political theory that the right action is the one that produces the greatest happiness of the greatest number. He devoted his life to legal, penal, and constitutional reform, and his thought shaped the reform movements of nineteenth-century Britain. His critique of natural rights in Anarchical Fallacies is the classical statement of the utilitarian objection to the doctrine of rights.

Source

The quotation comes from Anarchical Fallacies, written in 1796 and published posthumously in the Bowring edition of Bentham's works (1843). The work is a commentary on the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (1789), and it is one of the most sustained attacks on the theory of natural rights ever written.

Context

Bentham wrote Anarchical Fallacies in the 1790s, in the midst of the French Revolution and its aftermath. The Declaration of the Rights of Man had proclaimed that "men are born and remain free and equal in rights" and that these rights are "natural, imprescriptible, and inalienable." Bentham's objection is twofold. First, the doctrine is a conceptual error: rights are the creatures of law, and where there is no law there are no rights — "right is the child of law; from real laws come real rights, but from imaginary laws, from 'laws of nature,' come imaginary rights." Second, the doctrine is politically dangerous: the claim that individuals have rights against all government dissolves the authority of government, and government — the only institution capable of securing happiness — is the condition of everything valuable. The "fallacy" of the Declaration is that it arms individuals with claims that no government can satisfy and every law must violate.

Meaning

The quotation condenses Bentham's critique into its most famous formula. "Natural rights is simple nonsense" states the conceptual claim: the very idea of a right that exists independently of legal institutions is unintelligible, because a right is a legal status — the protection of an interest by the law. "Natural and imprescriptible rights, rhetorical nonsense" sharpens the point: the adjectives of the Declaration multiply the confusion, since no right is literally "imprescriptible" — incapable of being lost or limited — in any legal order that can exist. "Nonsense upon stilts" adds the rhetorical judgment: the doctrine is not merely false but dangerous, because it inflates a conceptual confusion into a political demand that undermines the very institutions on which happiness depends. For Bentham, the language of rights is not the language of liberation but the language of anarchy — and the only sound standard of political judgment is utility: the greatest happiness of the greatest number. The utilitarian tradition has never fully accepted Bentham's dismissal — rights have proven politically indispensable — but the critique remains the challenge that any theory of rights must answer.

The quotation belongs to the philosophical debate about the foundations of rights and justice. Bentham's claim that rights are creatures of law opposes the natural law tradition — from the Stoics through Locke's account of natural rights to the modern doctrine of human rights — and the debate between them remains alive: are rights discovered in the nature of things, or constructed by institutions? The utilitarian framework of the critique connects to the wider philosophy of utilitarianism, and the question Bentham raises — what grounds the demands we make on government? — is the permanent question of political philosophy.

Knowledge Network

Archive references

Sources

2 scholarly sources
  • 01
    Anarchical FallaciesBy Jeremy Bentham1796. In The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 2, ed. John Bowring. Edinburgh, 1843.
  • 02
    Jeremy BenthamBy Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyConsult source

ZHAIBIAN Editorial Board reviewed

Reviewed by ZHAIBIAN AI Editorial Review · 2026-08-05

Based on 2 scholarly sourcesLast updated 2026-08-05