Quotation archive
“Whatever is dependently co-arisen, that is explained to be emptiness. That, being a dependent designation, is itself the middle way.”
Nagarjuna · Mulamadhyamakakarika (Fundamental Verses on the Middle Way)
Quote record
Author
Nagarjuna
Source
Mulamadhyamakakarika (Fundamental Verses on the Middle Way)
Chapter / location
24.18, c. 2nd century CE
Tradition
nagarjuna · emptiness · madhyamaka · buddhist-philosophy · sunyata · middle-way
Source information
From Mulamadhyamakakarika (Fundamental Verses on the Middle Way), 24.18, c. 2nd century CE.
Original language: Sanskrit
Translation
Translated from Sanskrit into English using a named scholarly edition.
Context
Nagarjuna (c. 150-250 CE), the founder of the Madhyamaka (Middle Way) school of Mahayana Buddhism, composed the Mulamadhyamakakarika (Fundamental Verses on the Middle Way) in India in the second century CE. The work is a systematic philosophical poem of twenty-seven chapters devoted to a single thesis: that all things are empty (shunya) of intrinsic existence, because everything arises in dependence on conditions. Verse 24.18, quoted here, is the most famous verse of the entire text, and it defines emptiness in a way that is easily misunderstood: emptiness does not mean nothingness but dependent origination — the fact that things exist only in relation.
Interpretation
Nagarjuna's definition of emptiness from the Fundamental Verses on the Middle Way: whatever is dependently co-arisen is emptiness — the heart of Madhyamaka Buddhist philosophy.
Knowledge network
Related Archive Records
Quote
"Whatever is dependently co-arisen, that is explained to be emptiness. That, being a dependent designation, is itself the middle way." — Nagarjuna, Mulamadhyamakakarika 24.18 (2nd century CE)
Author
Nagarjuna (c. 150–250 CE) was an Indian Buddhist philosopher, the founder of the Madhyamaka (Middle Way) school and one of the most important thinkers in the history of Buddhism. He is traditionally associated with the great monastic university of Nalanda, and his works — the Fundamental Verses on the Middle Way above all — shaped the subsequent development of Mahayana Buddhism in India, Tibet, China, and Japan. The Dalai Lama has called Nagarjuna the greatest philosopher the tradition has produced.
Source
The quotation is verse 24.18 of the Mulamadhyamakakarika (Fundamental Verses on the Middle Way), composed in Sanskrit in the second century CE. The translation used here is Jay L. Garfield's, from The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way (Oxford University Press, 1995), the standard English translation of the text.
Context
The verse appears in the twenty-fourth chapter of the Mulamadhyamakakarika, where Nagarjuna replies to an imagined opponent who has accused the Madhyamaka of nihilism: if all things are empty, the opponent objects, then nothing exists, the Buddha's teaching is destroyed, and enlightenment is impossible. Nagarjuna's reply is that the opponent has misunderstood emptiness. Emptiness is not the denial of existence but the description of how things exist: everything arises in dependence on conditions (pratitya-samutpada), and to say that a thing is empty is to say that it has no independent, self-existent essence — not that it does not exist. The verse states this definition, and it adds the crucial claim: emptiness is not a doctrine beyond the world but the very structure of the world, and understanding it is the middle way between the two extremes of eternalism (things exist inherently) and nihilism (nothing exists at all).
Meaning
The verse is the philosophical heart of Mahayana Buddhism, and its meaning unfolds in three claims. The first: whatever arises in dependence on causes and conditions is empty. This is the definition of emptiness (shunyata): not nothingness, but the absence of intrinsic existence. The second: emptiness itself is a "dependent designation" — the word "emptiness" is itself empty, a concept that points beyond itself and must not be reified. This prevents emptiness from becoming a new absolute, a hidden essence. The third: this understanding is "the middle way" — the path between the two extremes of affirming that things exist in themselves and denying that anything exists at all. Nagarjuna's emptiness is thus not a nihilistic conclusion but a therapeutic insight: the suffering that Buddhism diagnoses is caused by grasping at things — including ourselves — as if they had fixed, independent natures, and the insight of emptiness loosens that grasp. The verse explains why the philosophy of emptiness is a philosophy of liberation rather than despair.
Related Wisdom
The verse connects emptiness to the deepest themes of the Buddhist wisdom tradition: impermanence (all things change because all things depend on conditions), the nature of reality (things exist only in relation), and the nature of the self (what we call the self is itself dependently arisen). Its insistence that the middle way is between eternalism and nihilism resonates with the wider philosophical tradition's struggle to think change and identity together — from Heraclitus's river to the process philosophies of the twentieth century. And for the modern reader, Nagarjuna's emptiness is a rigorous reminder that interdependence is not a mystical slogan but a precise philosophical thesis.
Continue Learning
Knowledge NetworkDeep Dive
Explore related concepts
- thinker
Nagarjuna: Philosophy, Quotes & Legacy
Related through Buddhism
- topic
Inner Peace
Related through Buddhism
- collection
Buddhist Wisdom
Related through Buddhism
- wisdom
Identity
Related through Buddhism
- wisdom
Impermanence
Related through Buddhism
- topic
Meaning in Life
Related through Identity
- wisdom
Reality
Related through Identity
- answer
Exploring the Nature of Time
Related through Buddhism
Archive references
Sources
- 01NagarjunaBy Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyConsult source
- 02The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle WayBy NagarjunaTrans. Jay L. Garfield. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995. Verse 24.18.
ZHAIBIAN Editorial Board reviewed
Reviewed by ZHAIBIAN AI Editorial Review · 2026-08-05